How would you compensate for roll film which have multiple exposures from different lighting conditions. I don't suppose there is an easy answer to this if any at all.
Would PyroCat help in situations with high contrast with its staining qualities ?
As it happens there is an easy answer, or more than one because , as David has said, different photographers use different means to achieve their objective.
Here is the approach I use. For 35mm and roll film I use HP5. It gives me everything I want. I like the look I am able to achieve with it in the final print, both in the darkroom and digitally. It scans easily. It has inherent low contrast and therefore gives you a head start when trying to avoid a build up of contrast.
All kinds of developers have been touted as so-called compensation developers. Pyrocat HD, which you mention, does work very well. But I have found that ID11 and Perceptol work equally well, when used in dilute form. I use both but prefer the look I get with ID11, with HP5. ID11 is normally diluted 1:1. But if you dilute it further, to 1:3 you get a compensating developer. But with very long dev. times. I found that the 1:2 dilution does just as good a job in this respect. So my method with 35mm and 120 is to use HP5, rated at 200 ISO, i.e. overexposed by one stop. This will be exposed on bright sunny subjects, less contrasty subjects in the shade, and on other subjects when it may be quite bright but the sun may not actually be out.
I develop the film for 14 minutes in ID11 diluted 1:2. And I get a range of negatives which are not wildly different in contrast. The contrasty ones, taken in bright sun, will usually print in the darkroom by going down to, say, grade 1.5. The flatter negatives , taken in flatter light, will probably need grade 3.4 or even 4. Other negatives, exposed to hazy sun perhaps, will print on maybe grade2.5 or 3. In other words there is enough leeway in the multigrade system to cope easily with the variation of different contrasts on the roll of film.
And these negatives scan well.
Alan