Rose In Watering Can FomaPan 100 D23

Ian-Barber

Admin
Registered User
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
1,714
Tucked away under the spare wheel of the car I found a box of FomaPan 100 sheet film with a sticker on the top saying 3 unexposed sheets left 2017.
So these had been in the car for the past 3 1/2 years... hmmm.

Not knowing the condition, I decided to make an exposure and develop it in the Kodak D23 home brew developer for 7 minutes 30 seconds.
Rose In Watering Can.jpg
 
That's just lovely and exactly the sort of thing for which D-23 is well suited.

Very nicely done.
 
That's just lovely and exactly the sort of thing for which D-23 is well suited.

Very nicely done.

Thanks, from your experience with D23, are there any types of subjects or lighting which its not that well suited for
 
Thanks, from your experience with D23, are there any types of subjects or lighting which its not that well suited for

In full disclosure, I am relatively new to D-23 myself. My observation is that D-23 is well suited whether there is a bright highlight scale one wishes to reign in to give the highlights a sort of soft "glow". The developer effectively is flattening the film curve at the higher end of the brightness range.

Low agitation long development causes the shadows to fully form (full ASA). When you combine D-23 with that technique, you can handle subjects with long subject brightness ranges and get images that really have highlights that pop along with meaty shadows.

In side-by-side comparisons that I've done this year, semistand D-23 1:1 and semistand Pyrocat-HD 1.5:1:200 produce very similar results.
 
Low agitation long development causes the shadows to fully form (full ASA). When you combine D-23 with that technique, you can handle subjects with long subject brightness ranges and get images that really have highlights that pop along with meaty shadows.

When you say "low agitation" are you referring to time between agitations or the length of agitation.
Have you done a write up on this ?

In side-by-side comparisons that I've done this year, semistand D-23 1:1 and semistand Pyrocat-HD 1.5:1:200 produce very similar results

I was going to ask you if you had done these comparisons so it's interesting to hear that they do give similar results which backs up what I read elsewhere.
 
When you say "low agitation" are you referring to time between agitations or the length of agitation.
Have you done a write up on this ?

Low frequency/low duration agitation.


I was going to ask you if you had done these comparisons so it's interesting to hear that they do give similar results which backs up what I read elsewhere.
 
Back
Top