- Joined
- Oct 21, 2020
- Messages
- 464
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I first gravitated to the Ilfotec because of convenience, in that I currently have no space for a dedicated darkroom and thus all my developing is done in our kitchen. My chemicals and graduates etc are stored in a cupboard in the hall, and after a session that's where they have to return - pronto!Excellent. And beautiful tonality from the Ilfotec.
The 90mm has indeed very little room for movements, but I still love it. Sadly the e bay 'chancers' have moved in in the UK big time on old Schneiders ... and indeed practically anything large format - and you see stupid prices for ones with galloping fungus and stuffed up shutters. We all need to make a stand and not support inflated prices for junk.
I'm actually very fond of the 'snub nosed' and slightly pugnacious looking little Angulon ... and have become used to its less than ideal handling. and would buy another in a heartbeat as the sharpness more than makes up for the quirks.Over the years I've named the main UK ebay LF chancers, and tell people in person to avoid them. Two I can think off have listed 90mm Angulons for around the £200 mark (approx $260), reputable reliable dealers sell them for around £100 with a 6 month warranty. The worst culprit had quite a number of high priced 90mm Angulons listed a few years ago and itwas quite clear he had listed the some of the lenses a few time. ThTwo othe lenses that get listed in a similarway with way with over the top prices are the 135mm and 150mm Xenars.
The post WWII 90mm Angulon vignettes before running out of sharp coverage, the older pre-WWII version has a slightly larger image circle (I have one). The secret is to compensate any tilt with corresponding rise/fall to keep inside the image circle to avoid vignetting.
Ian
I'm actually very fond of the 'snub nosed' and slightly pugnacious looking little Angulon ... and have become used to its less than ideal handling. and would buy another in a heartbeat as the sharpness more than makes up for the quirks.
I think the sad bit is that lots of beginners - not only at large format, but also in particular in medium format too - are getting stiffed. I spent a lot of my pro career using various Mamiyas: C330 for weddings and RB67s for studio in my early years, and I see horribly ratty examples of both of these types stuck at stupid 'buy it now' prices or starting self destructive bidding wars. The problem with any camera that was intended for hard professional use is that unsurprisingly it is likely to have had hard professional use - and thus be basically worn out.
I have a leica 3b from 1939 - it's nice, and many youngsters would wet their pants simply because its pre war - but I'm like you, a big negative person. I worked as a junior wedding photographer in my 20s and the studio who employed me handed out the Hasselblad kits to the experienced guys ... us juniors got the C330 kits. Manfrotto pod - 65mm, 80mm and 135mm lenses and a big, hammerhead Metz flash gun (with a wet cell shoulder pack) - that's how I cut my photographic teeth.I happen have a nice, very clean C-330 Pro for sale without reserve and priced reasonably on eBay US. I arrived at the entry price based on discounting what actual models had just sold for and set the "Buy It Now" price to favor me. This seems like a fair way to price things. (see: https://www.ebay.com/itm/174900276934)
Like you, I have history with these TLRs and keep one or two around to be rebuilt and used 'just for fun'. I've often commented that a well preserved Mamiya TLR with one of the later Black or Blue Dot lenses can be had for under $500-ish US and it will blow away the best Leica film and digital bodies for sheer rendering power and tonal range. There simply is no substitute for negative surface area. But Leica has now become such a cult among especially the youngsters that the prices are in the insane-osphere. I kept my IIIf but that's about it. I digress ... it's a disease of older years ...