Foma 100, 200, 400. Which is which?

Alan Clark

Very Active Poster
Registered User
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
854
Someone was asking recently about the differences between Foma 100, Foma 200 and Foma 400. Here are three photographs, one taken with Foma 100, one with 200 and one with 400. Can to tell which is which? All 5 x 4.pinewood wheeldale.jpgsheep eskdale.jpgstile baysdale.jpg
 
I could not guess which is which, but I do like the 3rd (bottom photograph) best. Did you use a filter for the sky?
 
The test is a bit unclear because they're not all the same scene shot under similar lighting, filtration, etc. That said, from top to bottom, I'd guess 200, 100, 400.
 
The test is a bit unclear because they're not all the same scene shot under similar lighting, filtration, etc. That said, from top to bottom, I'd guess 200, 100, 400.
Nice try. You got one right.
From the top
400
100
200
 
Someone was asking recently about the differences between Foma 100, Foma 200 and Foma 400. Here are three photographs, one taken with Foma 100, one with 200 and one with 400. Can to tell which is which? All 5 x 4.View attachment 5611View attachment 5612View attachment 5613
I guessed
1. 400
2. 200
3. 100

Really nice textures and composition. Developed in id11 1+2?

Orange filter really brings out the sky. I wonder how it would react if you have a human within the frame
 
I guessed
1. 400
2. 200
3. 100

Really nice textures and composition. Developed in id11 1+2?

Orange filter really brings out the sky. I wonder how it would react if you have a human within the frame
A person in the photograph could have been interesting. It was taken near the Northern end of the North York Moors, not far from Tees-side. If I'd waited ling enough I might have got someone from Middlesbrough pinching the stile....
 
Back
Top