Airport Scanning

gnomus

Popular Poster
Registered User
Joined
Sep 16, 2019
Messages
72
I will be heading to the US a little later this year and am thinking of shooting film (probably MF - I think the challenges of LF might just be a step too far). I have a number of concerns regarding the effect of modern airport scanning machines on unprocessed film. My internet researches have been helpful, but it seems that there are still some 'foggy' areas. Here is a brief summary of what I think I have found.

1) It seems that there is universal agreement that film should not be placed in checked baggage. The Internet folks seem unanimous that this will lead to fogged film.

2) It is recommended that photographers place their films in a clear plastic bag and should ask for a 'hand search' when going through airport security.

3) Nevertheless, the screener may insist that the films go through their scanning machine. This need not necessarily be disastrous. Older Internet posts suggest that films of less than 800 ISO may be able to go through airport scanning machines up to 5 times without the risk of 'significant' fogging.

4) There seems to be some suggestion that newer scanning machines may not be so friendly as older machines (many of the posts I have read are 10 or more years old). However, I don't know if the 'newer machines fear' has any basis in fact. Does anyone know if the guidance has been updated in recent years?

5) The Internettites seem agreed that there is little point in putting films in a lead-lined bag. It is said that when modern airport scanning machines fail to penetrate the lead lining, the machines increase their output in an attempt to see through the bag. Again, I don't know if this is accurate or nonsense.

6) There is a reasonable photography store at my US destination and I have already confirmed that I would be able to pick up film in the US, meaning that, if I took it back unprocessed, it would only have to go through the scanning system once.

7) I have looked into the possibility of having films developed whilst out in the US. It seems that I could get colour film developed on a 'next day' basis (which would be do-able). Black and White, however, would take a week to process - although I might be able to expedite this ... for a higher fee. I think, on balance, I would prefer to process my own film.

So, after that long-winded exposition, my question is: do any forum members have experience of transporting films through airport security systems and, if so, have they run into any significant problems in doing so?
 
I've done it many times and can honestly say that fogging by the scanners was not the biggest problem, it was the attitude of some of the security people when you ask for a hand search, both in the UK and the US. Most of them are too lazy and can't be bothered doing a search and if you confront them, then they'll get officious and tell you to ditch the film if they can't inspect it.....or you won't fly!

There are new scanners out there (particularly in the US) that can completely fog film of any speed.

If you can buy film at your destination, then that's what i'd do. Once exposed, you can either process locally or hand-carry the heavily marked EXPOSED FILM boxes/rolls and insist on hand inspection. There's no reason why you couldn't get your colour work processed locally and take (or buy) the equipment you need to process your B&W work yourself in the hotel. BUT........do not take chemicals out with you or return with them. Many are marked as corrosive/hazardous etc, so they will not be allowed on the aircraft......and i talk from experience :)

Mike
 
Last time I went through airport security was 2 years ago with no problems, un exposed and exposed film, don’t know, but things might have changed since then
 
There's a current thread on Photrio the US have introduced new scanners towards the end of last so read the new information carefully. they link to this PeterPixel article.

Here in the UK carry on scanners are safe for many hundreds of scans although as users we'd never get close, I think just over 20 was the most I've had the same film scanned.

Ian
 
Thanks all. Those new machines sound a little concerning.
 
Back
Top