- Joined
- Jun 5, 2024
- Messages
- 61
Hi all
I may be other thinking this but I had read for a while now about the advantages of pyrocat-HD and started looking into EMA and the such.
A while back I switched over to using EuroHC due to shortages which by all accounts has pyrocatechol in and I have been happy with it.
Now venturing into 4x5 I am wondering if I should give pyrocat-HD a go instead. Now apart from the compensating and staining effects that I could potentially see with pyrocat over eurohc has anyone tested the difference in grain, tonality, sharpness and microcontrast etc... between these two?
I may well be just over thinking things but thought I would pose the question in case. I will be using it at present mainly with foma and possibly shanghai films. I also have a hyrid workflow so will be scanning in rather than creating darkroom prints. Given that I also shoot mainly landscapes I can see how pyrocat would offer a number of advantages but thought I would ask first.
Thanks in advance
Mark
I may be other thinking this but I had read for a while now about the advantages of pyrocat-HD and started looking into EMA and the such.
A while back I switched over to using EuroHC due to shortages which by all accounts has pyrocatechol in and I have been happy with it.
Now venturing into 4x5 I am wondering if I should give pyrocat-HD a go instead. Now apart from the compensating and staining effects that I could potentially see with pyrocat over eurohc has anyone tested the difference in grain, tonality, sharpness and microcontrast etc... between these two?
I may well be just over thinking things but thought I would pose the question in case. I will be using it at present mainly with foma and possibly shanghai films. I also have a hyrid workflow so will be scanning in rather than creating darkroom prints. Given that I also shoot mainly landscapes I can see how pyrocat would offer a number of advantages but thought I would ask first.
Thanks in advance
Mark