The other day I was listening to a former professional photographer. He argued that there’s no point in bothering with 4 × 5 format, stick with medium format instead. The marginal gain in quality isn’t worth the hassle of lugging a bulky folding camera, lenses, film holders, and a tripod. You can pick up a medium‑format system for about the price of a single 4 × 5 lens. I’d love to hear what you think about his take on this
Hi M,
Before getting an MPP 5x4, and before I got into large format photography, I bought a 1/2 plate De Vere enlarger, as it looked just great, with chains and endless belows. My best friend said that he had bought a wooden Kodak 1/2 camera, what a coincidence.
Anyway, he loaned me the camera, and I studied photography in all of it's forms, as I was having a great time learning.
Carrying this wooden camera, and old Manfrotti tripod and 6x films, was pretty uncomfortable, but walking through the New Forest, looking for shots, was absolutely worth the 'pain' and it certainly concentrated my mind to set everything up, Weston light meter, Cooke and
Schneider-Kreuznach lenses and aperture and exposure.
I have since bought digital cameras and really don't like them, for all of their brilliance and too many menus to understand, they take the pleasure out of photography for me, so now I hardly take a photo these days.
C.