Hey martin, yes it’s the original Sinar ground glass. I’ll live with it as the pros out weigh this minor thing. Not having to lock the movements, having rise/fall, shift and focus all on the rear standard not affecting perspective is a blow my mind moment. The depth of field scale is going to be gold also.My Sinar f2 is really bright. I use it with the reflex viewfinder. Your ground glass looks to be a Sinar original too?
It looks a great bundle and in nice condition which isn't always easy to find.Hey martin, yes it’s the original Sinar ground glass. I’ll live with it as the pros out weigh this minor thing. Not having to lock the movements, having rise/fall, shift and focus all on the rear standard not affecting perspective is a blow my mind moment. The depth of field scale is going to be gold also.
I would love to try the reflex finder. The misses loves the ease of use and logical process of movements. Also not having to focus after every movement amazing.
It looks a great bundle and in nice condition which isn't always easy to find.
It's just coincidental, because I had my f2 out for a play today.![]()
Yes, and I'm using it in combination with a Sinar autoaperture shutter and brass/historic lenses.I didn’t realise you had a f2. I take it you used it indoors? Lol
Smart combo. Sinar has many benefitsYes, and I'm using it in combination with a Sinar autoaperture shutter and brass/historic lenses.
That's one of the major benefits of the sinar system.![]()
Looks nice. Good job you got holders with it.I bought this half-plate camera at auction last week, but neither the camera or lens has a maker's name on it. Does anyone have any suggestions of what it could be? I need to buy some small screws to re-attach the front standard to the hinges at the front of the camera.
To save on weight you might consider making an adapter in the Y shape of the originals but it would need to attach to the existing brass ring. If you find pictures online you'll see what I mean. I've had a few of the adapters in various sizes over the years but always sold them because I didn't have any cameras that fit.This is the tripod mount for the Houghton camera - what is the best/easiest way to adapt it to fit on a modern Manfrotto tripod? Would it be to fabricate a wooden piece to attach to the round section and insert a 1/4 inch thread into it?
If we could make a CAD plan I'd happily laser cut you 18mm ply 'Y' with a 1/4 or 3/8 tapped in tripod bush ... Do it for the cost of the Tripod bushing if I can turn it into a video for my channelThis is the tripod mount for the Houghton camera - what is the best/easiest way to adapt it to fit on a modern Manfrotto tripod? Would it be to fabricate a wooden piece to attach to the round section and insert a 1/4 inch thread into it?
I'd be up for that! Where are you based?If we could make a CAD plan I'd happily laser cut you 18mm ply 'Y' with a 1/4 or 3/8 tapped in tripod bush ... Do it for the cost of the Tripod bushing if I can turn it into a video for my channel![]()
East LondonI'd be up for that! Where are you based?
It's annoying, but I used to have a Thornton Pickard with a tripod ring like that - but I sold it. Otherwise I could have used it to take the measurements from.Great idea for a your channel , I have er now 5 Sanderson regulars that have the similar tripod ring - my “design” thoughts are around using a slot for each tripod lug in a wooden circle so they fit over the lugs and use a pinch bolt to secure, I have a couple of sets of the original tripod legs which are actually really stable and light but it takes some wrangling to fit the legs while holding the camera looks really nice